Connect with us

Know

More questions than answers in deadly ferry collision

Bill DeYoung

Published

on

Ferry accident victim Jose Castro left behind two young daughters. Photo provided.

Carmen Ulloa arrived Tuesday afternoon on a flight from Peru, just as she’d done so many times to visit her two adult children in Pinellas County.

This time, she was coming to bury her son.

Jose “Pepe” Castro, 41, was killed Sunday night when the Clearwater Ferry, on which he was a passenger, was rammed by a fast-moving pleasure boat near Memorial Causeway in Clearwater Bay. There were 45 people on the ferry. At least eight others were injured.

Although no charges have been filed, investigators said that 62-year-old Jeffry Knight was behind the wheel of the 37-foot center console vessel that struck the slow-moving ferry at approximately 8:40 p.m.

RELATED STORY: Victim, boat operator’s names released in fatal Clearwater accident

“I’m feeling devastated,” Sandy Todd, Castro’s sister, told the Catalyst. The siblings emigrated to the United States in the early 2000s. “I know my brother is not coming back, but I want the person who is responsible for this situation to pay for what he did.”

Jose Castro with daughters Jolene, left, and Ivory. Photo provided.

Castro, who worked at a U.S. postal service distribution center, was the father of two girls, ages 8 and 3, with his ex-girlfriend, Jenny Hernandez.

“Words cannot express the sorrow and pain my daughter is going through,” Rodriguez wrote on Facebook. “He was an amazing, dedicated father and his biggest joy in life were his 2 girls. The only thing that mattered to him was that his girls were happy.”

Knight, who owns the downtown St. Petersburg concert venue Jannus Live, has a history of boat mishaps. In 2012, a passenger on Knight’s yacht, attempting to step onto a dock at 6 a.m., after a night of partying, hit his head and drowned. Knight was not charged.

In 2017, he was cited for careless operation of a vessel, and for allowing a person under 14 years old to operate a boat. 

Records also show that Knight has three DUI arrests.

After Sunday’s incident, video from a security camera in a nearby park showed that Knight’s boat – which carried five other people – stayed in the area for several minutes, then left the scene. Police caught up with the vessel at a boat ramp three miles to the south.

A Breathalyzer test conducted there showed that Knight was not intoxicated.

Emotions flared on social media, as residents expressed outrage that Knight, who many referred to as a “habitual offender,” had not been charged in the accident.

A message posted on the Jannus Live Facebook page urged residents to be patient: “We ask that judgement be reserved while the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the United States Coast Guard conduct their thorough investigation into what occurred that night.”

The message (signed “With Sincere Appreciation, the Jannus Live Family”) offered condolences to the victims and their families.

Screengrab from a City of Clearwater video, showing the moment before impact.

Tuesday afternoon, Knight’s attorney J. Kevin Hayslett sent a letter to investigator Richard Shefano of the Conservation Commission, which is leading the multi-agency investigation, “to provide factual context regarding Mr. Knight’s actions at the scene” and “to request the preservation of critical evidence.”

Among his statements:

“Immediately after the accident, Mr. Knight directed a passenger on his vessel to call 911, and that passenger remained on the line with the 911 operator for nearly twelve minutes. During this time, the caller relayed updates and emergency directions, such as telling Mr. Knight to instruct all the ferry passengers to immediately put on a life jacket. Mr. Knight tied his vessel to the ferry in order to stabilize it and render aid. He used his boat to maneuver the ferry closer to shore so that first responders would have easier access to the passengers.”

“While Mr. Knight was still on scene and assisting, he noticed that his boat had taken on a large amount of water and all of his bilge pumps were activated. At that point, he became concerned that his boat might sink and he decided that as soon as he was able, he needed to get his boat back to his dock where he could safely lift it out of the water. Only after Clearwater Police Officers were in the water and ambulances had arrived did Mr. Knight leave in order to prevent his boat from sinking with an infant on board.”

“The available evidence, including eyewitness testimony, 911 call records, and video footage, demonstrates conclusively that Mr. Knight rendered immediate and appropriate assistance, coordinated with emergency responders, and departed only after rescue operations were well underway. This conduct is exactly what Florida Statutes §§ 327.30(1) and (2) require. Accordingly, any suggestion that Mr. Knight unlawfully left the scene is wholly unsupported.”

“Several witnesses aboard Mr. Knight’s vessel indicated that the frantic mother of an infant on board pleaded for immediate transport following the crash because she was concerned that her 8-week-old child may have suffered injuries. However, given the circumstances, including vessel draft, water depth, and the compromised condition of Mr. Knight’s boat, he prudently determined that returning to dock as quickly as possible was the best course of action. Again, it is important to note that he waited until emergency personnel arrived on scene before he departed.

“While he was attempting to navigate home, his vessel was stopped by law enforcement. They were able to do a visual inspection of Mr. Knight’s boat to determine that it was able to continue to the Belleair boat ramp. Mr. Knight was towed to the boat ramp at their insistence where fire rescue met the infant to do a medical assessment.

“This measured decision was entirely consistent with his duty under § 327.30(1), which allows operators discretion to avoid exposing their own passengers to additional danger.”

“The uncontested facts show that Mr. Knight acted in full compliance with Florida law, rendered meaningful assistance to the ferry and its passengers, was sober and cooperative throughout, and departed the scene only after rescue efforts were underway. These actions are supported by neutral eyewitnesses. Allegations to the contrary are not grounded in fact or law and appear to be driven by misinformation.

“Given the seriousness of this matter and the misinformation already circulating publicly, I respectfully request your prompt attention to the concerns and evidence outlined above.”

Sandy Todd said everything she’s been reading confuses her. “It was a hit-and-run. Why did he leave? Why, if he was a person, why didn’t he help? I want justice.

“I don’t know if he was the person who was driving – did they switch? I don’t know.”

A memorial service for Jose Castro will take place Saturday from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Moss Feaster Funeral Home, 693 Belcher Road in Clearwater.

The family has created a GoFundMe page to help with expenses. As of Thursday morning, more than $25,000 has been raised through private contributions.

Visit the GoFundMe page here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Hugh Hazeltine

    May 1, 2025at4:00 pm

    This from Statute 327.30 1 & 2. here is a quote: “also to give his or her name, address, and identification of his or her vessel in writing to any person injured and to the owner of any property damaged in the collision, accident, or other casualty.” It does not say you can do this the next day.

    Here is the language I believe Mr. Hayslett is using for his defense in the Statute: “It is the duty of the operator of a vessel involved in a collision, accident, or other casualty, so far as he or she can do so without serious danger to the operator’s own vessel, crew, and if any, to render to other persons affected by the collision.” Is he claiming that it would involve “serious danger” for Mr. Knight to remain on scene? Where was it more dangerous? To remain on scene where land, sea, and air rescue units were responding to on a calm night or to proceed south in the waterway in a damaged boat while taking on water with five passengers traveling in darkness.

  2. Avatar

    Hugh Hazeltine

    May 1, 2025at8:02 am

    I appreciate Mr. J. Kevin Hayslett has a client to represent. But lets review the facts as they are. After the collision Mr. Knight was concerned that his vessel was taking on water. Nearby was shallow calm water with a soft bottom. This solves the problem of fearing the boat could sink. Next, one of his passengers was concerned about the welfare of her infant child, understandable. But there was a “mass casualty event” and massive help was on the way. The welfare of all aboard his vessel would be assured. Instead, Mr. Knight sets out in the darkness for an intended 11 mile journey southbound in the waterway where a significant portion is “No Wake” along Indian Rocks Beach with a boat taking on water. Mr. Hayslett is lucky he does not have a second tragedy for which to defend is client.

  3. Avatar

    John Donovan

    April 30, 2025at8:48 pm

    The Daily Mail – London, has a story.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.


The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spark@stpetecatalyst.com

Subscribe for Free

Subscription Form

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.