Connect with us

Thrive

Local leaders express property tax elimination concerns

Mark Parker

Published

on

The bulk of St. Petersburg's property tax revenue, which funds citywide services, comes from developments downtown. Photo by Mark Parker.

State Senator Nick DiCeglie recently told city council members, much to their dismay, that the governor is intent on eliminating or significantly reducing property taxes. 

Those revenues account for 73% of St. Petersburg’s general fund, and most of that money supports public safety. Governor Ron DeSantis pushed to cut property taxes throughout a chaotic legislative session and recently pitched a plan to offer $1,000 rebates for each homesteaded property. 

While DeSantis said the lawmakers could approve the latter proposal this year, eliminating property taxes altogether would require a ballot referendum in November 2026. St. Petersburg officials discussed the potential impacts during a July 27 legislative committee meeting and a budget presentation later that day. 

ā€œIt’s clear to me, and should be clear to all of you here, that the governor is pretty focused on having a (property tax) question on the ballot,ā€ DiCeglie said. ā€œBut I share the same concerns.ā€ 

The Florida Policy Institute reports that property taxes generate $55 billion annually. The non-partisan think tank estimates that sales taxes may need to double, from 6% to 12%, to compensate for the loss in funding. 

St. Petersburg has $228.9 million in ad valorem revenue to fund a $411.76 million operating budget in fiscal year 2026. Assistant City Administrator Tom Greene said 95.6% of that money ā€œpays for our police and fire departments.ā€ 

Councilmember Lisset Hanewicz called the potential shortfall a ā€œbig concernā€ for city officials, as residents expect a ā€œlevel of serviceā€ from their local government. ā€œThe money is going to things that we really need,ā€ she said. 

If approved, Florida would become the first state with no income or property taxes. In addition to eliminating the critical funding source, lawmakers are considering a $500,000 homestead exemption, capped at $1 million for seniors, and a 15% cap on assessment increases. 

ā€œProperty taxes effectively require homeowners to pay rent to the government,ā€ DeSantis said in a prepared statement. He pitched the homestead exemption proposal in March and subsequently vetoed a study to evaluate how local governments use the revenue and the impacts of a reduction. 

ā€œThere’s no way the state is going to be giving tens or hundreds of millions of dollars directly to cities and counties to make up that difference,ā€ Rep. Lindsay Cross said Thursday. 

From left: Sen. Nick DiCeglie, Sen. Darryl Rouson, Rep. Lindsay Cross and Rep. Michele Rayner. Photo: St. Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce.

DiCeglie said the governor is ā€œbrushing offā€ the roughly $300 million potential shortfall for rural areas. He stressed the importance of letting the local delegation know those ā€œlarge numbersā€ in a city like St. Petersburg that will resonate ā€œwhen we try to balance a budget.ā€ 

While $300 million will not ā€œbreak the budget,ā€ DiCeglie, a Republican, believes that each city losing hundreds of millions of dollars should put ā€œa lot of our colleagues at the end of their seats.ā€ 

ā€œI don’t support a complete elimination of property tax,ā€ DiCeglie said. ā€œI’m not interested in handicapping local governments and their ability to provide services that we all expect, as we should.ā€ 

Rep. Michelle Rayner is one of 37 lawmakers on a House Select Committee created to study property tax reform. DeSantis bemoaned the bipartisan group in May at a press conference in Tampa before vetoing $1 million for the initiative. 

“You convene a 37-person committee if you’re trying to smother it in the crib,he said.They’re trying to kill any chance of property tax relief by doing this committee.”

Cross, a Democrat, said the committee will continue meeting throughout the summer. She does not believe there is much of an ā€œappetite to hear from our major metropolitan cities about their property tax flows.ā€ 

Councilmember Deborah Figgs-Sanders noted that schools receive 33% of Pinellas County property taxes. The district is currently scrambling to overcome the loss of $10.7 million in federal and state funding. 

Opponents believe eliminating ad valorem taxes would disproportionately benefit wealthy property owners while negatively impacting the average resident. Raymond James Financial ($130.37 million) topped St. Petersburg’s taxpayer rankings in 2024; downtown developments occupied second through eighth place.

In May, economic and workforce development director Brian Caper said those developments ā€œgenerate significantly higher tax revenue per acre and greatly contribute to the city’s ability to fund new projects and programs throughout St. Petersburg.ā€ For example, the Ascent condominiums paid $100.4 million per acre, compared to just $4.6 million for Raymond James.

David Thompson, director of government affairs for the city, reiterated Thursday that the governor is ā€œvery keen on eliminating property taxes, at least for homesteaded properties.ā€ DiCeglie called it a ā€œhuge topic of conversation,ā€ and said the ā€œdevil is in the details.ā€

ā€œI think as we get to committee weeks, maybe we’ll have a better idea,ā€ he added. ā€œBut we’ll see how it all plays out.ā€ 

 

 

9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Ryan Todd

    July 23, 2025at2:58 pm

    Replace the fed spending with nothing. Elected officials are drunk on Uncle Sugar’s dime taking no responsibility for their policy decisions while waiting for a handout from the Feds. It’s not the nation’s fault that St. Pete increased density in the high-hazard overlay. Time to act responsibly with our money, city council.

  2. John Avery

    John Avery

    July 22, 2025at9:23 pm

    Eliminate property taxes and replace it with WHAT? There are only 100 pennies in the dollar no mater how we wish otherwise.

  3. Avatar

    joseph boone

    July 22, 2025at8:29 pm

    How exactly do you plan to eliminate that and still have a safe, functioning city? You can’t run a major city or county in Florida without property taxes. And then they’re also eliminating the FEMA aid that’s supposed to help us rebuild after the hurricane hits. They’re taking away our ability to handle these disasters at all.

  4. Avatar

    Leilani Keaka

    July 22, 2025at7:43 pm

    What IS this? 55 billion gone from the state budget while D.C. slashes critical federal programs that protect the most vulnerable? Seems legit. Looks like our keepers are in the mood to burn it all down. 🫤

  5. Avatar

    Mike Kosempa

    July 22, 2025at6:58 pm

    Jeff subsidizing housing lotteries is not a “service”. You want 10 million dollars for other peoples kids to go to school? No problem. Stop subsidizing the adults housing. The problem isnt funding. The problem is perverse upside down priorities fueling perverse upside down incentives.

    There isnt enough money on this planet to realize our city governments fever dreams of buying their special interest group’s way to prosperity. It doesnt work that way.

  6. Avatar

    Alyssa Haley

    July 22, 2025at3:39 pm

    As a mom, that trade-off just doesn’t sit right with me. It could mean fewer resources for schools, public safety, and storm prep…

  7. Avatar

    Hugh Hazeltine

    July 22, 2025at9:57 am

    It is good to see Brian Caper talk about Tax revenue per acre. That is a good way to measure and compare.

  8. Avatar

    Ryan Todd

    July 21, 2025at4:56 pm

    I’m ecstatic that our property taxes are going to be eliminated. Taxes on the house I bought for my mother are killing me.

    Lisset mentioned that St Pete residents are ā€œā€¦accustomed to a level of serviceā€¦ā€, but I have to push back on that. We pay exorbitant taxes in St. Pete and get next to nothing in the way of essential service delivery – neighborhood streets are a mess with potholes.

  9. Avatar

    Jeff Jarr

    July 21, 2025at4:04 pm

    The need for local services does not go away, if property taxes are eliminated…all that happens is ANOTHER tax goes up.

    I am all for tight-fisted government, but that’s different than canceling a source of revenue…without understanding the impact of raising the money elsewhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please fill out all the form entries below. We do not publish anonymous comments. Comments are held for moderation per our posting guidelines - please read them. We appreciate your taking the time to share your perspective on how to improve our community.

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.


The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.Ā  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.Ā  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spa**@************st.com

Subscribe for Free

Subscription Form

Privacy Policy | Copyright Ā© 2020 St Pete Catalyst

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.