fbpx
Connect with us

Thrive

Whitted airport economic study money goes to trees instead

Mark Parker

Published

on

The St. Petersburg City Council removed funding for a long-discussed study on Albert Whitted Airport's economic impact from the fiscal year 2024 budget. Photo by Mark Parker.

A typically procedural meeting to approve year-end budget adjustments ended in debate as St. Petersburg City Council members discovered a $300,000 appropriation for an Albert Whitted Airport Economic Impact Study.

Mayor Ken Welch has discussed reevaluating the 100-acre, city-owned waterfront site’s usage since his first year in office. Council members and local stakeholders have voiced ardent, varying opinions on the nearly century-old municipal airport’s future.

In March, an evaluation committee selected consulting firm HR&A to conduct an economic impact study on the airport and its footprint in the expanding Innovation District. Progress essentially paused until the Nov. 27 budget “cleanup” meeting.

Councilmember Ed Montanari said Wednesday that he and other airport supporters believe the study is an attempt to “find a way to close the airport down and repurpose the land.”

Montanari added, “I didn’t want to approve any sort of money in the budget for a study of Albert Whitted Airport. So, that’s why I wanted to repurpose that money.”

The city council approved dedicating the $300,000 to the burgeoning Urban Tree Planting (UTP) program at the Nov. 27 meeting. After unexpected debate and withdrawn motions, the reallocation passed 4-3, with Councilmember John Muhammad absent.

City administrators included the $300,000 in the general fund’s fiscal year 2024 supplemental appropriations. Budget director Liz Makofske explained that the list is mostly budgeted items not purchased or completed before the new fiscal year.

Montanari said he did not see money for the study in the previously discussed budget. Makofske said administrators included $250,000 as a “consulting line” in the Economic and Workforce Development Department’s 2023 funding.

Makofske said prices “are going up,” and the consultant requested an additional appropriation. Montanari, a longtime proponent of increasing the city’s tree canopy, said he would like the UTP program to receive the money.

Councilmember Gina Driscoll also said the study funding was a last-minute surprise in the months-long budget process. “It certainly wasn’t brought up, and I would not have gone along with that,” she said.

“It’s been made clear that we don’t all agree on issues around the airport,” Driscoll added. “I like the idea of moving that to an urban tree planting program because that is certainly something we can all agree on.”

Council members disagreed on how they should reappropriate the funding. However, none spoke in favor of the airport study.

Administrator Rob Gerdes said the initiative stalled as city officials focused on momentous redevelopment projects – the Historic Gas Plant District, Tropicana Field and the St. Petersburg Municipal Marina. He called those “higher priorities.”

Even with the funding, Gerdes said the council would still need to approve the study in the spring, and work could begin next summer or fall. Councilmember Lisset Hanewicz noted that any recommended airport changes would then require a voter referendum.

“This has been coming up for a while, and it’s money sitting there,” Hanewicz said. “There are a lot of other big items happening in our city.”

Every council member expressed support for the tree canopy program. Many also said other initiatives were deserving of the money.

In addition, the council previously agreed that tree planting would begin in the underserved Child’s Park neighborhood, to mitigate pollution. The pilot program also awaits a study to determine the most effective citywide strategy.

Multiple council members said they were unprepared to vote on reallocating the money. Vice Chair Deborah Figgs-Sanders said she also supports “homeless children and other efforts that we can make an immediate impact with this year.”

Councilmembers Driscoll, Hanewicz, Montanari and Copley Gerdes voted to transfer the economic impact study’s funding to the Urban Tree Program. Councilmembers Figgs-Sanders, Brandi Gabbard and Richie Floyd dissented.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 Comments

10 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Jeanette R Bulatowicz

    December 4, 2023at7:17 pm

    We do need more trees in St Pete.. a bit more shade, coolness, beauty. Less skin damage and cleaner air would be nice 👍🌳

  2. Avatar

    John O'Brien

    December 4, 2023at11:02 am

    Have you ever stopped and asked yourself, “What are the flight paths over my house?” Trust us — it can make a difference in your quality of life! Residing in close proximity to an airport, or even near a popular flight path, can mean lots of noise all day and all night, which isn’t exactly a way to establish good energy in your new space. Not to mention exposure to all that residual jet fuel!

  3. Avatar

    Donna Kostreva

    December 3, 2023at12:18 pm

    John O’Brien I have lived within a mile of AW for 46 years knowing they are involved in life saving work daily. I enjoy the “touch and go” drills knowing new pilots are earning their wings. If you bought property that is less valuable today, don’t blame AW!

  4. Avatar

    Velva Lee Heraty.

    December 2, 2023at7:53 pm

    Wise decision. I’d love to see the trees replaced on 300 2nd St S along the Hilton Hotel on the East side of the street. A former employee didn’t like taking care of them and has them all cut down. Now it’s a sun-baked oven all year long. The more cement we pour the more trees are needed.

  5. Avatar

    Mike Connelly

    December 2, 2023at5:31 pm

    Albert Whitted is a special place and we’re lucky to have it in Saint Petersburg. I’m glad the study was tabled for the time being and hopefully it’s safe from condos until the next attempt to “study” it.

    All PR … 40-50 FKIGHTS PER DAY OVER AND OVER AGAIN.Who is benefiting ?

    Follow the money … Who has vested interest. And who are we training to fly … The onslaught of 7 days a week started right after Ukraine .

  6. Avatar

    Tim

    December 2, 2023at5:02 pm

    What kind of study cost a quarter of a million dollars a pre-construction study that’s what

  7. Avatar

    Jonathan MIcocci

    December 2, 2023at4:24 pm

    The value of a downtown airport will be exponentially higher in the future as the highways become ever more clogged. There is a growing opportunity for more short/medium range air travel options, potentially with hybrid and electric aircraft. St Pete has an exquisite resource which must not be lost to future generations because one person has not yet understood it.

  8. Avatar

    Ryan Todd

    December 1, 2023at6:04 pm

    Thank God for Councilman Montanari‘s leadership on this issue. I’m looking forward to the city reallocating the $200 million its committed to Rays’ welfare.

  9. Avatar

    Kari Mueller

    November 29, 2023at6:45 pm

    Albert Whitted airport has immeasurable value to the public as it serves as an extension of the waterfront park systems. I ride my bike past it almost every day and down to SPC, then up to Vinoy and back.

    Often I watch the sunrise at either the pier or Demen’s landing and the airport is an important part of the view. It needs to be preserved and protected.

    Many pilots come to regional airports like AW from all over the world to get flight hours and advance their certifications. These pilots work for airlines piloting flights throughout Florida. The ability to advance their certifications adds value to the commercial airline industry of Florida.

    Albert Whitted is a special place and we’re lucky to have it in Saint Petersburg. I’m glad the study was tabled for the time being and hopefully it’s safe from condos until the next attempt to “study” it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.

The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spark@stpetecatalyst.com

Subscribe for Free

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.