Thrive
Rays could leave St. Pete, regardless of bond votes
St. Petersburg is next at-bat to vote on a bond issuance to finance the city’s contribution to a new Tampa Bay Rays stadium. It might not matter.
The team sent a stern letter to Pinellas County commissioners before their delayed bond vote Tuesday evening. Rays presidents Brian Auld and Matt Silverman wrote that the commission’s Oct. 29 decision to postpone approving a perceived formality rendered agreements approved in July financially unfeasible.
The commission balked again and will revisit the critical measure Dec. 17. St. Petersburg officials discussed their upcoming bond issuance at a Thursday morning committee meeting.
Councilmember Lisset Hanewicz asked if the Rays could abandon the deal – which, in St. Petersburg’s case, includes the entire $6.7 billion redevelopment project – without penalty until March 31. “Yes,” replied City Attorney Jackie Kovilaritch.
“So, the county – they can approve the bonds,” Hanewicz continued. “We can approve the bonds, and they (the Rays) can still walk away, right?”
“Yes,” concurred Tom Greene, assistant city administrator.
Kovilaritch said the agreements do not require the commission or council to approve a bond sale. She also noted team officials requested a penalty provision with unspecified liquidated damages, to no avail.
The Rays wrote that it was “known and accepted” in July that the county needed to adopt its bond resolution by the Nov. 5 election to open the new ballpark by 2028. Voters recently elected two new commissioners with varying levels of deal opposition to replace two staunch supporters.
The city passed its initial master bond resolution and related agreements in July. However, the team’s letter stated they suspended extensive work on the stadium and 30-year redevelopment project due to “the county’s failure to live up to its July agreement.”
The full council will vote on a supplemental bond resolution and validation – part of a complex process – later Thursday afternoon. Hanewicz asked if the council was contractually obligated to hold a vote today. Kovilaritch said it was not required.
Hanewicz then asked if the “heavily negotiated agreement” stipulated that the city or county must vote on the issuance before an election or any other date. “There’s nothing that I recall,” Kovilaritch said.
“I just wanted to make sure what they said in their letter, in terms of the county’s commitment and all that, the reality is, we don’t have to approve this,” Hanewicz said.
Mayor Ken Welch began the meeting by noting that unexpected developments have impeded the Historic Gas Plant District’s redevelopment. He also believes there is still a “path to success.”
However, Welch said that requires the city to fulfill previously approved, “painstakingly negotiated” agreements. The plan’s success also requires the county and Rays to remain willing partners.
“Given that context, we think it’s important that we as a city complete the necessary steps to finalize funding for our commitments – our share of the stadium and infrastructure costs – so we can fulfill our obligations under the agreement,” Welch added. “These bonds are based on the overall city contribution that was approved by the city council.
“There are no additional funds being requested.”
Auld and Silverman wrote that Hurricane Milton shredding Tropicana Field’s roof “devastated the organization.” The city is responsible for over $55 million in repairs, and Welch reiterated his intention to foot the bill.
City Administrator Rob Gerdes told the commission Tuesday night that a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reimbursement potentially could cover between 75% and 85% of the Trop’s repair costs. Insurance proceeds will also help lessen the financial burden.
Gerdes said the team may have played its last inning at the Trop. However, that would require “some type of settlement” with the team to void the city’s current use agreement.
Commissioner Chris Latvala then asked if the Rays could request a check for the repair costs and continue playing in Tampa for the foreseeable future. “We’ve certainly had discussions with the team about that,” Gerdes replied.
“I’m not going to go into specific numbers in a public setting,” he said. “It’s more fiscally responsible for us to repair the stadium …”
Debi Mazor
November 22, 2024at11:32 am
The real tragedy would be the abandonment of the envisioned “Gas Plant District,”’if that were to fall in the wake of the failure of both government entities to fund the project. At least that reparation should be approved.
Alan DeLisle
November 22, 2024at8:41 am
If only Welch had listened to what it’s really like dealing with the Wall Street Rays. He fell into their trap, along with the sold out five, and got taken for everything the city had. He negotiated the worst baseball/development deal ever and the sold out five Council members approved it.
Public officials: get out of this deal as fast as you can. It is so poorly written . . . take the hits and run. As bad as it is, it will be even worse as the years go on and the residents do without and the Rays continue to hold up the city and county.
I suspect some careers will be ruined when it’s all over. Sad for such a great city.
Ryan
November 21, 2024at6:00 pm
Let’s put some “underemployed” people to work with sockets and wrenches to start taking the Trop apart with the ~$50 million instead of repairing its skeletal remains.
It’s an eyesore and an ever present reminder of our leaders’ incompetency.
Billy Miller
November 21, 2024at5:33 pm
Adiamo and Adios! So many Citizens of Pinellas County are in crisis and were worried about these millionaire nitwits?
Paul Vari
November 21, 2024at5:02 pm
What a mess, Rays should move on to The City of Tampa like the other two Sports Franchises. Attendence will never be good there, it’s not a Sports town like Tampa. Not sure why this is still a big issue, should be a no brainer to move to Tampa.