fbpx
Connect with us

Two firms vie to design new Rays stadium

Mark Parker

Published

on

Kansas City-based Populous will provided architectural and engineering services for a new Tampa Bay Rays ballpark, with a focus on community integration and accessibility. Rendering: Rays/Hines.

An evaluation committee comprised of the three Tampa Bay Rays representatives and four city officials is already considering two proposals for architectural and engineering services on a $1.3 billion ballpark.

Launching the design phase for Tropicana Field’s replacement this month is imperative to completing construction by Opening Day 2028. One of two firms – MEIS Architects or Populous – will commence the momentous project.

The committee will hear presentations and conduct interviews before making its selection Nov. 15. Kansas City-based Populous appeared to be the early frontrunner.

“I really like that they (Populous) are leading with trust, collaboration, communication and cohesiveness,” said Allison Mihalich, sustainability and resiliency officer. “I think that’s extremely important as we think about the Historic Gas Plant District and surrounding environment.”

Populous has designed hundreds of ballparks, including Truist Field, home to the Atlanta Braves. Screengrab.

Populous

Kansas City, Missouri-based Populous is a global design firm with extensive stadium and arena experience over the past 40 years. According to its website, the company has worked on over 3,000 projects totaling more than $60 billion.

University of South Florida officials selected the firm to design a long-awaited on-campus football stadium in Tampa. Mihalic credited the company for detailing its approach to mitigating environmental impacts in St. Petersburg.

However, she noted that Populous has worked on 135 ballparks, and only three received Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certifications. The committee repeatedly stressed the importance of a new stadium achieving that global benchmark.

Bill Wiener, chief people and community officer for the Rays, said he was impressed by the firm’s staff availability. He called their proposal comprehensive and thoughtful.

“I loved how it was attuned to … our core values,” Wiener added. “And the other thing that jumped out was the Historical Gas Plant. They get that relationship, and they understand how important it is.”

George Dowling, senior director of building operations for the Rays, appreciated that women comprise nearly half of the project team. The selected firm must adhere to strict minority and woman-owned business requirements.

Dowling said Populous grasped the public-private partnership’s vision. Rob Gagliardi, chief financial officer for the Rays, echoed his colleague’s sentiment.

Gagliardi said the firm understood the importance of the stadium connecting to the Edge District. He said Populous recognized that “this is not just the Rays’ ballpark, it’s St. Pete’s ballpark.”

Gagliardi also credited the proposal for stating that “seats don’t drive revenue, experiences do. We want people coming back – not just attending a game one time – and that was really built into their approach.”

MEIS Architects recently designed Everton Stadium, which will host the Everton F.C. in Liverpool, England. Screengrab.

MEIS Architects

According to its website, New York City-based MEIS Architects has designed dozens of prominent national and global sporting venues. Those include Major League Baseball’s Safeco Field in Seattle and Miller Park in Milwaukee.

In 2020, MEIS merged with global architecture and planning firm Perkins Eastman. The company also listed multiple partners in its design proposal, and Gagliardi said he would like some clarity on what projects MEIS has led.

He said the company’s timeline was more concerning. Gagliardi explained the proposal mentioned visiting the site and meeting with project stakeholders but lacked a specific timeframe.

Wiener noted that MEIS committed one staff member to remain on-site throughout the process. “That’s not enough, in my personal view,” he said.

“I think we got to get into some more detail regarding the relationship with people in the Historical Gas Plant,” Wiener added. “But the approach, overall, hit all the high points.”

Raul Quintana, city architect, questioned what role Perkins Eastman would play in the project. He believes stakeholders could potentially leverage the global firm’s expertise and said the proposal referred to the group as a “dream team.”

Quintana credited MEIS for understanding the challenges of making an enclosed ballpark welcoming to the surrounding community. However, he said the proposal did not reflect the “criticality of the schedule.”

Brejesh Prayman, capital improvements director for the city, called MEIS’ approach “a little weak.” He said the team would spend several days on-site reviewing hazardous material conditions but did not mention gaining a better understanding of the Gas Plant’s historical significance.

“That relationship was lost,” Prayman said. “I think this is a team that’s capable under qualifications … but did not provide as strong of a project approach.”

The committee will hear presentations privately before publicly deliberating on the two proposals Nov. 15. While the evaluation process typically occurs at the Municipal Services Center downtown, the committee will select a design firm at the Campbell Park Recreation Center in South St. Pete.

City officials have yet to announce when the public meeting will start, and proposals remain sealed throughout the evaluation process.

 

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Rodger Kaputnik

    November 6, 2023at6:32 pm

    INCREDIBLE Waste of $$$$$$.

    $1.3 Billion plus interest would be Far better spent on projects that would produce property tax relief.

    Unreal & Irresponsible Mess.

  2. Avatar

    Truman

    November 4, 2023at10:35 pm

    I was thinking… Well, they are definitely, hitting all of the boxes here LoL. First, there’s LEED and sustainability… Then, whoa, there’s your meaning and ‘importance’ of the relationship to the Gas Plant Area Haha. And, BAMMMM… Just like that (all within a 4 outta 5 paragraph span lol), there’s your HALF of the ‘project team’ being made-up with WOMEN, & MUST BE, along with STRICT ‘minority’ owned REQUIREMENTS. Boy, they’re really, checking ALL the boxes here, with this one… Never seen SUCH a VIRTUOUS “Sales” (or con) Job before. It’s Unbelievable. Just SICK. All nothing but a huge ‘virtue-signal’ & LIE. How bout we choose based off of who’s THE BEST… Based off of JUST ‘Merit’ ALONE. Enough of this junk. It’s “racist” on it’s face. I do NOT support any of this, now!!!! They definitely, made sure to hit them ALL. I don’t trust ANY of these people, NOW. No-way! This is a JOKE. Unbelievable. But, THAT is what THEY are worried about… Instead of, just putting the very BEST possible deal and plan together!? No Thanks! NOT interested. NOT anymore. DONE. It is an absolute ‘INSULT’ to everyone’s intelligence. DEI always equals, Incompetence. It is all a LIE. Period. End of Story.

  3. Avatar

    Paul

    November 4, 2023at9:15 am

    University of “Southern” Florida?

  4. Avatar

    Jared Duke

    November 4, 2023at6:57 am

    Why are we going out of state to find architectural firm for this? Is there not a local or in state firm capable of designing this?
    I’m Hopeful that they select local construction firms as well!

  5. Avatar

    Kari M

    November 3, 2023at3:46 pm

    While these are both great design firms, the committee meeting to decide gives an impression that the stadium is approved for funding. City council still needs to vote on giving the Rays $600 million and the land tax free for 30 years.

    The terms of the Rays/Hines deal were late in getting delivered to council (compared to the city administration having access). Please view the October 26th Committee of the Whole meeting on St Pete TV.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.


The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spark@stpetecatalyst.com

Subscribe for Free

Subscription Form

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.