Connect with us

Impact

New study says municipalizing utilities will be $4.1 billion

Business leaders urge a Duke deal as St. Pete awaits its own $590,000 analysis.

Aaron Styza

Published

on

Duke Energy estimates St. Petersburg could spend between $2.75 billion and $4.1 billion to acquire and separate the company’s electric system as the city considers creating a municipal utility. Photo: Duke Energy.

A Duke Energy-commissioned analysis estimates St. Petersburg could spend between $2.75 billion and $4.1 billion to create a municipal electric utility, and local business leaders say it reinforces their concerns about the city’s pursuit of utility municipalization without financial justification.

Duke retained Concentric Energy Advisors to conduct the preliminary analysis, which estimates it could take seven to 10 years for St. Petersburg to acquire, separate and independently operate the company’s electric system. The firm’s projections assume a municipal utility would begin operating in either 2033 or 2036.

The analysis puts the current net book value allocated to Duke’s St. Petersburg customers at approximately $693 million. Concentric projects the assets themselves could cost between $1.25 billion and $1.65 billion by the time a potential acquisition is completed.

Buying the assets, however, accounts for only part of Duke’s estimate. Concentric projects that an additional $1.18 billion to $1.88 billion would be needed to separate St. Petersburg’s electric system from Duke’s surrounding network and rebuild infrastructure necessary for both systems to operate independently.

Work could require approximately 150 miles of new distribution lines, 16 miles of transmission lines, four new substations and two subaqueous transmission crossings. The study identifies additional projects around Gateway and the Pasadena, Gulfport, St. Pete Beach and Treasure Island portions of the system.

Jason Mathis, CEO of the St. Petersburg Downtown Partnership, said the new estimate does not change concerns he raised before the city’s 30-year franchise agreement with Duke expired July 31. He has questioned whether St. Petersburg should spend billions creating an electric utility while facing other, more urgent infrastructure needs, saying, “Whether it’s $1 billion, $2 billion or $4 billion, it’s money that the city doesn’t have. Our city is facing incredible strain and there are bigger priorities.”

Chris Steinocher, president and CEO of the St. Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce, echoed those concerns: “The $2.9, $4 billion doesn’t shock me,” Steinocher told the Catalyst. “We saw Clearwater’s study. It’s not the right time for us right now, and those numbers show how serious and big this conversation is. I understand those getting priced out of communities due to utility rates, but we have so many other systems that need attention and relief, like stormwater and sewage. This just isn’t the right time.”

Mathis said the city could address some of the affordability concerns that helped drive interest in municipalization without purchasing Duke’s system. “If the push for municipalization was for affordability,” Mathis said. “The city could get rid of the franchise fee and the utility tax. That would address affordability immediately.”

Before the franchise expired, Duke collected a 6% franchise fee from customers and remitted about $23 million annually to St. Petersburg in exchange for its use of public rights-of-way. Mathis previously told the Catalyst that allowing the agreement to expire without a new deal created uncertainty for businesses and questioned the city’s decision to spend up to $590,000 on its own municipalization study.

That study is being conducted by NewGen Strategies and Solutions, the same firm that previously studied municipalization for Clearwater. The St. Petersburg analysis is intended to determine the financial and operational feasibility of the city acquiring Duke’s infrastructure and operating its own electric utility.

Mathis said St. Petersburg’s system presents another complication, because Duke infrastructure within the city is interconnected with surrounding communities.

“Detaching St. Pete from Gulfport and all the beach communities would be more complicated than the feasibility study in Clearwater,” Mathis said. “Clearwater spent a lot of time and money investigating this idea, then abandoned it when they realized how expensive it would be.”

Concentric’s estimate identifies that separation as one of the largest potential expenses. The firm says portions of Duke’s system would have to be reconstructed to maintain service to customers in St. Pete Beach, Treasure Island, Gulfport, Tierra Verde and surrounding areas of Pinellas County.

“We need to negotiate the best deal, the best terms with Duke — that’s the city’s job,” Mathis declared.

Steinocher also questioned whether the city’s independent study will reach substantially different conclusions from Duke’s analysis: “My belief is that the numbers will be similar to Duke’s study. Some of this is real figures that can’t be fudged. It’s a math problem not up for interpretation. It’s an intriguing effort but not worth its weight in gold.”

Ana Gibbs, director of communications and public affairs for Duke Energy Florida, released a prepared statement, writing “This study makes clear a government takeover of St. Petersburg’s electric service is unaffordable and irresponsible. Our residents deserve a clear understanding of the costs, risks, and long-term implications of this unprecedented proposal.”

Gibbs said Duke believes that “a government takeover could cost as much as $4 billion, and our customers would ultimately be asked to shoulder the burden through higher taxes and increased fees or worse, a reduction in public services,” Gibbs said. “Duke Energy Florida and its predecessors have delivered cost-effective, reliable, electric service for decades and we are committed to continue providing the same level of service as the city learns more about the risks of this proposal.”

Concentric estimates St. Petersburg would need between $185 million and $330 million to establish an independent utility. That includes staffing, vehicles, control facilities, billing and outage-management systems, cybersecurity and other operational infrastructure. Transaction costs and initial financial reserves could add another $144 million to $240 million.

The report also identifies potential costs that are not included in its $2.75 billion to $4.1 billion estimate. Concentric says St. Petersburg could face $300 million to $550 million in stranded generation and power-supply costs, depending on how the city obtains electricity after separating from Duke.

Concentric also did not quantify the potential cost of replicating portions of Duke’s automated grid technology that could be affected by separating the systems. The firm cautions that a more detailed feasibility study could identify additional costs.

That being said, the city’s NewGen study may provide an independent estimate of whether municipalization is financially viable and give city officials a basis to compare its assumptions with Duke’s – or at the very least, provide new knowledge for better negotiating power.

 
 
 
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Page Obenshain

    September 2, 2026at2:44 pm

    Like our city, I know nothing about running a utility but I do know that the city should provide services and should not run enterprise operations. Enterprise operations are meant be run like a business. This is a bad idea as Clearwater discovered. Do we doubt Clearwaters decision?

  2. Avatar

    LESLIE FERRARA

    September 2, 2026at1:05 pm

    Having the local municipality handle anything as complex as the electrical grid is such a bad idea. With our tendency toward big storms and lightning, we need to have experts who know and have the latest technology at hand to fix things. I pay the same amount each month on an average billing cycle and my rate hast gone down over the years! I want Duke to stay. My question is, do we get to vote on it or are we just stuck with whatever a study and 10 or so people want to do? Those elected officials who I bet don’t know a thing about running a mammoth undertaking as this. Clearwater showed good sense in leaving it to the professionals!

  3. Avatar

    jeff Brown

    September 2, 2026at5:02 am

    Yeah, well, the city’s track record on big projects is dismal at best. Have you all forgotten about the pier fiasco? and lets not forget how they have handled the loss of the Rays to Tampa, spent millions on a building only to tear it down in a couple of years to build something they can not agree on, to only dismiss the designs and ask for new ones, you know, just like the pier, and you think they can actually handle something as complex as the electrical grid, hold on while i look for my lahghing hysterical emoji.

  4. Avatar

    S. Rose Smith-Hayes

    September 1, 2026at9:04 pm

    There has to be a better way. Individual homeowners are not being smart in their use of electricity. Duke offers to assist homeowners and how many accept that help? I am on the plan where I pay the same amount each month for electricity. With $4 billion plus infrastructure needs facing the City and the possibility of the Property Tax bill passing because folk do Not understand what it means, this is not the time. Please get with Duke and renew the contract. Then figure out how to raise the $5 to $6 billion needed to have City run electricity. Then figure out how to disconnect from other cities when St Pete runs their own electrical company.

  5. Avatar

    JAMES GILLESPIE

    September 1, 2026at7:40 pm

    if the new study cost estimate is reasonably close to the real cost of replacement of Duke both the Chamber and Downtown Partnership are on the right side of the argument. to do good the city appears to think it can better utility performance and also deal with the many interconnections involved. replacement time will see the rise of estimated costs and will the solution really improve the affordability of life for low and middle income residents? I certainly believe the state public service commission could give more weight to the interests and need of rate payers than shareholders, but that seems unlikely based on past performance.

    there are about 2000 municipal utilities in america serving about one in seven people so it can be done. one can only react which seems a dream beyond this city’s capacity and experience.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We appreciate your taking the time to share your perspective. Note: Catalyst and Cityverse are non-anonymous platforms. Please include your full first and full last name, as well as your email when commenting (your email address will not be published). Comments without these elements will not be published. Comments are held for moderation per our posting guidelines - please read them.

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.

The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spa**@************st.com

Subscribe for Free

Subscription Form

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2026 St Pete Catalyst

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.