fbpx
Connect with us

Thrive

Potential sewage plant solutions include a massive wall

Mark Parker

Published

on

A $70 million project at the Northeast Water Reclamation Facility will elevate critical equipment to 11 feet above sea level. Storm surge from a major hurricane would still render the plant inoperable. Photo: City of St. Petersburg.

Storm-hardening two of St. Petersburg’s wastewater treatment facilities shuttered during recent hurricanes was a prominent topic at a recent City Council meeting.

Administrators will consider any innovative storm resiliency solutions amid increasingly severe extreme weather events. Efforts to elevate the Northeast Water Reclamation Facility – rendered useless during Hurricanes Helene and Milton – are underway.

The most vulnerable sewage treatment plant in St. Petersburg can withstand a seven-foot storm surge, which the city had never experienced before Helene. A $70 million project will increase that threshold to 11 feet, two feet above the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s flood elevation.

However, meteorologists expected Milton to inundate the area with a 12-to15-foot wall of water. At the Dec. 5 city council meeting, Claude Tankersley, public works director, said the estimated storm surge for a Category 5 hurricane is between 25 and 42 feet.

“If we were to raise the plant to be safe under 42 feet of a storm surge – that’s probably not feasible,” Tankersley said. “We probably couldn’t afford to do that, and I’m sure the surrounding neighborhoods probably wouldn’t like to see a four-story wastewater treatment plant right next to them.”

Tankersley said city officials must discuss the most feasible approaches to protecting sewage facilities “where they are.” Waterbodies surround the northeast plant, the city’s lowest-lying, at 1160 62nd Ave. NE.

The Southwest Water Reclamation Facility – also shuttered during Milton – can withstand an 11-foot storm surge. The plant at 3800 54th Ave. S. abuts wetlands that lead to Tampa Bay.

City officials shuttered the Southwest Water Reclamation Facility during Hurricane Milton. Photo: Water Collaborative Delivery Association.

The city lacks the developable land needed to relocate its sewage treatment plants to higher ground. Tankersley noted that the base elevations for the two facilities are between five and seven feet.

He said Pensacola officials purchased about 25 acres of vacant property 15 miles north of the city’s core to build a new treatment plant after Hurricane Ivan decimated the Panhandle in 2004. “Then they had to build a bunch of pipelines to pump all that sewage in the opposite direction … and it cost them close to half a billion dollars.”

“Unfortunately, we don’t really have that opportunity,” Tankesley added. “It’s just one of the things that makes our resilience different than another community.”

The city’s conundrum will likely require an outside-of-the-box approach. Councilmember Lisset Hanewicz asked if administrators considered perimeter flood barriers.

Tampa General Hospital recently made headlines for implementing an AquaFence, a temporary impermeable barrier, around its island facility during recent storms. However, it can only withstand a 15-foot storm surge.

“One of the options thrown to us at one point was to build a wall around the plants,” Tankersley said. “That has its own challenges, and it can be very costly. But it’s certainly something we would consider as part of our cost-benefit analysis.”

Roughly two-thirds of St. Petersburg depends on the vulnerable sewage treatment plants to flush toilets, bathe and wash clothes. While running water remains accessible during outages, officials urge residents and businesses not to drain sinks or tubs.

Failure to heed those warnings could cause extensive raw sewage overflows. The northeast plant leaked over one million gallons into surrounding neighborhoods and waterbodies when officials took it offline during Helene.

Hanewicz said she heard that hospitals could not flush toilets during the recent storms. City Administrator Rob Gerdes disagreed with that assessment.

Tankersley said officials raised critical electrical equipment at the southwest facility to 12 feet above sea level. That work is ongoing at the northeast plant, and he expects the storm-hardening project to conclude in 2026.

“However, I will say we are trying to find ways to accelerate that so we can get it done sooner,” Tankersley said. “But I cannot make that promise at this time.”

Plant operators wait until the last minute to shut down the plants and flee the area. The fire department used high-water vehicles to rescue workers stranded by rapidly rising floodwaters during Helene.

In April, council members approved an initiative to storm-harden operations and maintenance buildings at the city’s three water reclamation facilities. While the city recently secured about $9 million in state funding to complete the design phase, Tankersley said construction would not commence until 2027.

Funding remains the most significant hurdle to myriad planned environmental resiliency projects in St. Petersburg. Councilmember Gina Driscoll said it is “time to get more aggressive” in the city’s pursuit of federal dollars “because there is money out there for such things.”

 

 

 

 

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Avatar

    S. Rose Smith-Hayes

    December 10, 2024at8:55 pm

    And yet the City continues to build, build, build, those high rises which will cause the sewerage system to be ineffective even more. Thank you managers of the City.

  2. Avatar

    Steve Sullivan

    December 9, 2024at11:35 pm

    John Donovan, that’s a whole nother gripe. It’s distribution of the budget and you make like sitting in traffic and accidents where people are being injured and killed everyday but other people don’t

  3. Avatar

    Steve Sullivan

    December 9, 2024at11:31 pm

    Hal Freeman, in regards to the stadium financials do you not understand that purchasers of the bonds are investing in the city and that they are being leveraged against future tax and services fee revenue? It’s a zero sum net gain at its worst but in terms of indirect economic gains to the community at large it’s significant. Be factual and truthful

  4. Avatar

    John Donovan

    December 9, 2024at8:34 pm

    Real estate tax revenue is and has been growing very fast. For most of last 25 years. City has plenty of money. Save a few bucks by eliminating the speed bump crazies crusade against car comfort.

  5. Avatar

    Hal Freedman

    December 9, 2024at5:18 pm

    “Funding remains the most significant hurdle to myriad planned environmental resiliency projects in St. Petersburg. Councilmember Gina Driscoll said it is “time to get more aggressive” in the city’s pursuit of federal dollars “because there is money out there for such things.””

    This seems like a much higher priority for current resources and future borrowing power than a stadium. The administration and 4 Council people sure blew this one by approving bonds for a stadium!

  6. Avatar

    Bill Herrmann

    December 9, 2024at4:44 pm

    Why reinvent the wheel??? Use the same design as Tampa General Hospital. We know that works! From what I read, the construction is straightforward and could be in place with8n a year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.


The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spark@stpetecatalyst.com

Subscribe for Free

Subscription Form

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.