Connect with us

Thrive

Rough waters: Tampa Bay Watch addresses accusations of unfair advantages

Veronica Brezina

Published

on

Sunset view from the St. Pete Pier. Photo: Bill DeYoung

The Tampa Bay Watch group has recently come under fire by commercial St. Pete Pier tenants, accusing the nonprofit marine education group of conducting commercial activities thus, creating unfair competition for businesses. 

“[Tampa Bay Watch] suddenly moves to commercial [docks], jumping a waitlist, and now they are doing dolphin tours, site seeing … plus they are advertising at The Pier. How is that fair to any of the other businesses that are on the strip?” Bill Waters, a local boat captain, said during a Thursday St. Petersburg City Council meeting. “This doesn’t pass the smell test.” 

There are currently 22 companies on a waitlist for a commercial dock. 

The discussion on Tampa Bay Watch taking a commercial slip follows a hearing and staff report requested by councilmembers after receiving an advertisement for a “winter wonderland boat tour” held aboard Tampa Bay Watch’s research vessel.  

The Tampa Bay Watch group and Chris Ballestra, managing director of development for the city, cleared the air about Tampa Bay Watch’s operations and the language in the lease. 

In 2016, Ballestra explained, Tampa Bay Watch was selected to operate an educational research facility at the new St. Pete Pier. The proposal included language pertaining to managing a vessel. 

The lease was signed in 2018 and under the agreement, it stated Tampa Bay Watch would not be required to pay rent to the city for the educational facility and that it could have a courtesy dock. It was all reflected in the lease, Ballestra reiterated.

The rumor that the commercial dock was made available to Tampa Bay Watch by evicting a previous tenant, he stated, is false. 

“We asked to go to a commercial slip for several reasons, including the fact we couldn’t provide signage and we wouldn’t have to move our boat twice a day from the temporary slips,” Tampa Bay Watch CEO Dwayne Virgint said.

Ballestra also shared some history of Pier Dolphin Cruises.  

He said Pier Dolphin Cruises started in the ’80s under a different ownership group. It was then purchased in 2020. 

Ballestra noted how Pier Dolphin Cruises also filed a complaint against a tiki hut vessel operating out of the marina, which had the permits to do so. 

St. Pete resident Ken Grimes, a captain of the Pier Dolphin Cruises and runs an aviation business, also spoke in opposition. 

“I’m in the aviation business and we aggressively compete, it’s a simple playbook. We get ourselves next to them [a competing service] at a gate and we match their routes and then slash our prices by 33% – that’s what’s happened here,” Grimes said. 

He continued and said the Tampa Bay Watch is able to advertise at the Pier and matches the Pier Dolphin Cruise’s routes and times, but charges much less. 

The overall conclusion from the councilmembers – the pair must be able to coexist as neighbors. 

“It’s important to me to have both of these vessels for our residents and visitors to enjoy,” Councilmember Gina Driscoll said. “We’ve got to find a way for this to work … no one is going away. Both groups are going to have to figure out how to coexist.” 

Ballestra said a relocation could be at hand for the Tampa Bay Watch vessel. 

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Avatar

    jimmy m brattain

    February 3, 2022at7:04 pm

    “Both groups are going to have to figure out how to coexist”. Hey Gina Driscoll & Chris Ballestra, how about you give Dolphin Cruise’s FREE rent on their slip as is afforded the “Non-Profit” charging 33% less for the same services? That seems equitable. Better yet, charge Tampa Bay Watch for their slip which is literally next to the Dolphin Cruise. Pretty sure the slip belongs to the taxpayers, the majority of which I bet, would welcome the additional revenue.

    PS WTH does Pier Dolphin Cruises filing a complaint against a tiki hut vessel operating out of the marina have to do with this seemingly corrupt move? The bases for complaint was the unsupervised DRUNK fest occurring on the vessels weekly. Isn’t that Chris Ballestra’s responsibility as managing director of development for the city, to protect the city from costly lawsuits? Tool.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.

The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spark@stpetecatalyst.com

Subscribe for Free

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.