Connect with us

Thrive

St. Pete delays inclusive flag vote amid ‘theatrics’

“I want to throw a haymaker; I don’t want to throw a jab.”

Mark Parker

Published

on

Political drama and concerns over state retaliation permeated a City Council discussion Thursday. At issue was St. Petersburg adopting two alternative city flags to show solidarity with marginalized communities.

City Councilmember Gina Driscoll is leading those efforts in response to the state’s removal of similarly themed street murals. The city has long supported diversity and inclusivity, while acknowledging past and ongoing disparities.

Driscoll was temporarily overcome with emotion as it became apparent that she lacked the votes to pass a resolution. Councilmember Brandi Gabbard had a tense exchange with Mayor Ken Welch, who atypically interjected in the debate to address what he called “theatrics.”

“Someone could decide that I’ll be removed from office tomorrow just for bringing this forward,” Driscoll said of the state. “Here I am. I’m not afraid of this because I believe in it.”

Multiple council members wanted feedback from the community and additional information regarding potential state-led retaliation. The Florida Department of Transportation threatened to withhold funding if local governments failed to comply with the street art ban.

“What I don’t want to have is this not to pass today, and then there’s no further conversation,” said Councilmember Deborah Figgs Sanders. “I do want to know what our constituents have to say.”

The resolution states that St. Petersburg would fly the “Harmony” and “History” flags, which both include the official municipal seal, at “appropriate times of the year” at city facilities. “As with most art, these flags and their colors have a meaning to each person that is as unique as we are,” Driscoll said.

The Harmony flag features a rainbow design with added colors, including white, brown, black and pink. Driscoll noted it varies from the Pride flag officials raise annually in June.

The History flag’s red, yellow and green horizontal stripes represent African ancestry. St. Petersburg annually raises the Dr. Carter G. Woodson flag in February to celebrate Black History Month.

Driscoll said Terri Lipsey Scott, executive director of the Woodson African American Museum of Florida, offered her stamp of approval. “This takes it to the next level, where it’s not just about one group of people,” Driscoll explained.

“These flags have been created to be about everybody – to be about everyone in our city.”

She expressed concern that the state could preempt the city from flying the flags before a subsequent committee discussion. Councilmember Lisset Hanewicz noted a local broadcaster had already contacted the governor’s office for comment.

Molly Best, a spokesperson for Gov. Ron DeSantis, told the Seattle Times that the symbols are unnecessary because “we already have a flag that represents everyone.”

Council Chair Copley Gerdes said “everyone wants to make a stand” after the state unceremoniously erased five murals over Labor Day weekend. Welch’s administration has already met with 20 stakeholders, released a memo outlining a path forward and conducted a community feedback survey that ended Thursday.

Gerdes suggested delaying the vote until an Oct. 23 Committee of the Whole meeting. Administrators could discuss the survey’s results, and officials could collectively unleash “multiple different ways that we stand up to what happened.”

“I want to throw a haymaker,” Gerdes added. “I don’t want to throw a jab.”

Council members will further discuss the flags in two weeks.

St. Petersburg adopted its first municipal flag in 1927. The city now uses a version redesigned in 1984.

The Republican-led Legislature has repeatedly attempted to pass a bill that would restrict the flying of municipal flags. Assistant City Attorney Brett Pettigrew reiterated that the state could abolish St. Petersburg, which lacks First Amendment free-speech protections.

“I just have some real concerns, in terms of doing something that the state’s going to turn around and completely preempt,” Hanewicz said. “And once they preempt it, you’re not getting it back.”

Gabbard took issue with the mayoral administration unveiling “an entire plan” without consulting the council. She also said Driscoll “didn’t have to do this alone.”

“Here we are, being asked to look at something that was done in a silo, and if we don’t vote for it, then it’s going to be pitted as though we don’t support our community. And that is unfair,” Gabbard continued. “Every single person up here supports every single part of our community.”

She believes the city is teetering on the brink of allowing the state’s erasures to “cause a divide between all of us, and I’m not going to stand for it.” Gabbard, who said she was late for a previously scheduled appointment, told residents that she will “always support you, but these flags are not it.”

She added that the city would be “that much more divided” if the mayor chose not to fly the flags. Gabbard waited to hear Welch address her “accusations.”

“The only plan was to listen to the community, listen to the ideas, listen to the council when that meeting happened and find the most sustainable way forward,” Welch said. “If you want to talk about this, give me a call, and we’ll do that.

“But the theatrics up here – I’m not going to deal with it. You’re setting up division.”

Welch said he would let council members finish their discussion before deciding on whether to utilize the flags. That will occur Oct. 23.

Driscoll amicably withdrew her motion and referred the resolution to a Committee of the Whole meeting. Gerdes had already scheduled the date.

Gabbard was absent, and Councilmember Mike Harting provided the lone “no” vote. “I think we can get to a good place on this,” Driscoll said.

 

 

10 Comments

10 Comments

  1. Avatar

    stephen major

    October 12, 2025at2:10 pm

    The city flag we have now represents everyone. Putting our city seal on a flag that represents a specific group is going to open a can of worms. If you are going to glorify a sexual preference, are you going to put the city seal on a Nazi flag? How about on a rebel flag? Let businesses and individuals fly whatever flag they want! And we already fly flags to represent both of those things underneath our city flag. This is a complete waste of taxpayer time and money.

  2. Avatar

    KAREN DOUGLAS

    October 11, 2025at3:54 pm

    I am not a resident of St Pete. I AM a resident of Pinellas County. I also am “woke” and prefer/demand inclusivity, but this whole flag idea is unnecessary. Find another way. Paint a bidg. Buy a billboard, whatever. NO representation of the “rebel” flag on anything and keep your city flag a businesslike emblem of your wonderful community. That’s plenty.

  3. Avatar

    Mike Kosempa

    October 11, 2025at12:36 pm

    These people will do literally anything to avoid doing their jobs.

  4. Avatar

    Susan Dickerson

    October 11, 2025at7:14 am

    What is wrong with the current City of Saint Pete Flag? How does it not include all? By creating a new flag with different colors seems to isolate and divide rather than unite. The City Counsel needs to address our tax paying dollars on the real neeeds of the city, like road repair, clogged drains that cause flooding, trimming the trees from electrical wirers, etc. Please, concentrate on what you have been elected to do!

  5. Avatar

    John Donovan

    October 11, 2025at5:58 am

    Why didn’t the public get to submit their own flag designs? Because then the public would have power and influence and no hosannas for politicians. Or,we could forget this all this nonsense and fix the roads.

  6. Avatar

    S. Rose Smith-Hayes

    October 11, 2025at4:12 am

    Fly the Red, White and Blue and the official City flag. Allow individuals to fly whatever flag they want. This is not worth the fight nor the time, please.

  7. Avatar

    JAMES GILLESPIE

    October 10, 2025at4:46 pm

    doubtful any answer will make a majority pleased. flat on fanfare

  8. Avatar

    Page Obenshain

    October 10, 2025at3:48 pm

    We are majority of proud Americans. Make the background Red, White and Blue. If it is presented all should vote yes.

  9. Avatar

    Will Lemmon

    October 10, 2025at3:32 pm

    This is silliness. Fly one flag that’s generic enough to represent everyone – no playing favorites.

  10. Avatar

    Ryan Todd

    October 10, 2025at3:22 pm

    What a complete waste of our time and taxpayer dollars. Let private citizens express themselves however they want. Fly one official city flag.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please fill out all the form entries below. We do not publish anonymous comments. Comments are held for moderation per our posting guidelines - please read them. We appreciate your taking the time to share your perspective on how to improve our community.

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.


The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spark@stpetecatalyst.com

Subscribe for Free

Subscription Form

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2025 St Pete Catalyst

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.