Connect with us

Know

St. Pete won’t see stormwater impact fees anytime soon

City Attorney Jackie Kovilaritch believes sewer capacity fees are exempt from Senate Bill 180. She also said the legal team can explore any potential loopholes on a “case-by-case basis.”

Mark Parker

Published

on

The average City of St. Petersburg utility customer will see an increase on their utility bill. File photo.

St. Petersburg residents face a 17.5% stormwater rate increase in October, after a 25% hike last year. Many would like to see developers contribute more to long-overdue infrastructure projects.

Multiple public speakers supported the additional costs approved Thursday evening at the city’s final utility rate public hearing, as the 2024 storm season highlighted significant deficiencies. One noted that St. Petersburg lacks a stormwater-specific impact fee, unlike several other Florida cities.

Capital Improvements Director Brejesh Prayman noted officials are “moving very aggressively” to implement those fees. However, they will likely have to wait until October 2027 due to the ever-increasing number of state preemptions. 

“The State of Florida can preempt us from doing things, period,” said Councilmember Lisset Hanewicz. “They give you power, and they take it away. It’s almost like every time you try to solve an issue, you talk to legal (attorneys) and they tell you that you can’t do it.” 

Senate Bill 180 restricts local governments from adopting more restrictive or burdensome land-use and development regulations after a natural disaster. The legislation encompasses site plan reviews, permitting and moratoriums – a pause on new construction. 

Prayman said the state did implement new construction site stormwater treatment requirements that could benefit the city. Developers will also see their sewer capacity fees soar from $600 to $1,000, a 66.7% spike. 

What can the city do?

Councilmember Richie Floyd, who “completely” supports raising impact fees, while realizing that is currently “impossible,” questioned how the city is still able to charge exponentially more for each new restroom that connects to the sewer system. 

City Attorney Jackie Kovilaritch believes sewer capacity fees are exempt from SB 180. She also said the legal team can explore any potential loopholes on a “case-by-case basis.” 

“So, it’s not like everything is 100% off the table before we have a specific analysis of a particular idea,” Kovilaritch added. “We need to consider it (SB 180) for everything, but it doesn’t mean we won’t analyze every idea separately.” 

Mack Feldman, vice president of Feldman Equities, is active in St. Petersburg’s development community. He has not heard of any concerns regarding the increased fees and told the Catalyst that an additional $100,000 to $200,000 for a large multifamily building “won’t move the needle in most cases.” 

However, Feldman noted that “every project is different,” and the additional costs will impact affordable housing projects more than luxury condominiums. “We should consider discounts for units at 120% of the area median income or below,” he said. 

When asked if $1,000 per restroom is fair when Hillsborough County charges $2,000, Feldman said, “It comes down to tradeoffs.” He added that policymakers must balance the need for more housing with the equally important need for infrastructure upgrades. 

“That would reduce new housing supply on the margins,” Feldman continued. “But we have a lot of infrastructure needs, too.” 

A summer thunderstorm in September 2024 flooded the area around Tyrone Boulevard and 9th Avenue North. Photo: Shaquille Lashley.

The city’s stormwater master plan calls for over $1 billion in projects throughout the next 30 years. Hanewicz reiterated that meeting that goal would require a roughly $50 million annual investment rather than the current $30 million. 

She said the city could not replace its water system, which has enough pipes to reach Montreal if laid end-to-end, until the year 2329 at current funding levels. “I want people to understand this – we are investing what we can.” 

Feldman believes he and his fellow developers are paying their “fair share.” He explained how a rash of new mixed-use projects downtown supports “the rest of the city’s finances,” even as officials lower property tax rates. 

For example, he provided a spreadsheet that showed the Saltaire condominiums increased the taxable value at 301 1st St. S. by $344.24 million when it opened in 2023. The city collected an additional $6.5 million in property taxes.

“Developers take a vacant or underutilized lot, like we’re doing with the City Center parking garage and Waldorf Astoria Residences St. Petersburg, and add millions to property tax collections after delivery,” Feldman said. “That contrasts with most other parts of the city, where many homes are homesteaded and have capped increases.”

Hanewicz similarly pushed back against the common belief that population growth is exacerbating stormwater and sewer problems. “We don’t have a capacity issue in our system,” she said. 

“It’s an old system that needs a lot of maintenance, repair and replacement. It’s all the old pipes that go into every home. This city was built over 100 years ago.” 

Another funding mechanism 

All property owners might pay more for stormwater projects following the November 2026 elections. Voters, through a ballot referendum, will likely decide if the mayoral administration issues general obligation bonds to fund St. Petersburg Agile Resiliency (SPAR) initiatives. 

An additional, separate property tax would finance the debt. Councilmember Brandi Gabbard previously said the city would not see any bond revenue until the spring of 2027, and “for me, that’s not good enough.” 

The governor has also pledged to eliminate property taxes or, at a minimum, provide “relief” via a referendum next year. “You’re asking, at the top of the ballot, for people to remove property taxes, and then you’re going all the way to the bottom of a ballot to ask them to increase them,” Gabbard noted Thursday. 

“I think that gives me even more concern, because it feels like that is our only plan,” she said. “I just don’t know what getting to be a resilient city looks like if we have all of our eggs in that basket, and it doesn’t happen.” 

City council members unanimously approved the rate changes, with Chair Copley Gerdes absent. The average utility customer will see an 8% to 10% overall increase on their bill, starting Oct. 1.

 

 

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Judy Too

    December 22, 2025at5:35 pm

    Looking at the huge increase in property tax revenues, one would want to believe taxpayers are getting more benefits. Unfortunately all those additional revenues are going down the waste, fraud and abuse drain. The state sees this trend in almost all counties. Here are a few examples illustrating what the state sees and why property taxes are due for a reduction.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG2Dd05lfOc
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POtg6IEJnTk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNQHNLa7v-g

    Watch, listen and learn how tax increases are disappearing without evidence, just excuses.
    Those taxpayers in St. Petersburg are seeing huge increases in property tax revenues, and utility bills are increased with very little benefit to the residents.

    For those who whine that the taxes for essential services are required, those services will not be cut.
    If successful, the state will help us lower the “discretionary” part of our property taxes while keeping safety, infrastructure and schools properly funded.

  2. Avatar

    S. Rose Smith-Hayes

    September 8, 2025at7:00 pm

    This issue only gets worse as time goes by. Building these large complexes need to just stop. Our infrastructure cannot handle it. Someone needs to wake up.

  3. Avatar

    joseph boone

    September 8, 2025at5:00 pm

    So… the state says the city can’t charge developers new impact fees to pay for the strain they put on our stormwater system. So instead, the city just raises the rates on all the existing residents by 17.5%. The buck always gets passed down to us!!

  4. Avatar

    julia burke

    September 8, 2025at10:33 am

    As a “regular” citizen, I find all of this budgetary stuff and all the legal implications and obstacles to be mind-boggling, truly. But what does jump out at me is the shocking inefficiency of ALL OF IT – from the feet-dragging of previous admins. to take action on NEEDED repairs to the byzantine red tape that exists to make it too convoluted to get ANYTHING DONE.

  5. Avatar

    JAMES GILLESPIE

    September 7, 2025at6:56 am

    council is right about the need for storm water increased funding. but it indicates past administrations should have acted too given an aged system and changes in climate and weather conditions. double digit changes impact many homeowners in a negative way and influence the housing market for affordability and workforce homes. developers of high value projects should bear a fair portion of the system’s increased system costs.

  6. Avatar

    Will Michaels

    September 6, 2025at3:07 pm

    Putting things in perspective, between 2023 and 2024 the entire City’s (not just the downtown) gross real and personal property ad valorem revenue increased by $20M. However, the budget for 2026 anticipates an increase of only $14M. Were all of that to be applied to stormwater infrastructure it would cover only 5% of the $271M needed for the City’s accelerated St. Pete Agile Resiliency Plan for stormwater projects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We appreciate your taking the time to share your perspective. Note: Catalyst and Cityverse are non-anonymous platforms. Please include your full first and full last name, as well as your email when commenting (your email address will not be published). Comments without these elements will not be published. Comments are held for moderation per our posting guidelines - please read them.

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.

The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spa**@************st.com

Subscribe for Free

Subscription Form

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2026 St Pete Catalyst

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.